Skip to main content

Post #12

Prompt: TBA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post #9

Prompt: " The relationship between Raskolnikov and Sonia grows in Chapter 4. What do you learn of her responsibilities? Why does Raskolnikov prostrate himself before her and kiss her feet. Explain his lines following this action (about human suffering). From whom had Sonia received her Bible? What is the significance? How does Sonia convert Raskolnikov. What is the story she reads him, and how is it important? The lines  “ . . . the murderer and the harlot who had come together so strangely to read the eternal book” are appropriate and interesting. Note the references to children as the image of Christ. Examine the biblical passages involved and their appropriateness." Answer: Sonia feels she has gained responsibilities after the death of father. Sonia now needs to help care for her younger siblings, and for Katerina because Katerina is ill. Katerina Ivanovna did, and now especially will struggle to keep her children fed. Sonia now needs to help assure that they are fed. So...

Post #4

Prompt: " Explain the function of the side story of Marmeladov. (How does his story contribute to a theme in the novel?)" Answer: The side story of Marmeladov functions to exemplify and showcase the theme if suffering in the novel. Marmeladov is poor, and crazy. Although, poverty is not the cause of his craziness, drinking is. Marmeladov is more or less addicted to alcohol, and what it does to him. He stole from his wife and kids so he could have money to drink. This brings him guilt. Marmeladov said '"[He had] sold her", his wife Katerina's, "very stockings for drink". Marmeladov knows he is in the wrong and had just spent five nights "on a hay barge, on the Neva".  Mameladov says he drinks to "try to find sympathy and feeling in drink", also "so that [he] may suffer twice as much" This puts Marmeladov in a vicious, alcohol fueled, suffering cycle. He suffers because he drinks and he drinks to suffer. Taking money ...

Post #10

Prompt: " What attitude does Dostoevsky create about Lebezyatnikov’s advanced social view? What is the tone? Contrast the tone with that afforded Luzhin. Why the difference? Although the novel is largely about great questions—sin, redemption, crime, punishment, and murder—much political and economic theory exists as well. What can you find in the text to constitute Dostoevsky’s attitudes towards capitalism and socialism? What is his preferred method?" Answer: Luzhin  is quite narrow-minded, and thinks less of women than other characters. He really wants to marry a poor woman so that she can't escape. This is why she chose Dounia.  In contrast, Lebezyatnikov believes in the modern philosophies. Lebezyatnikov is also less self-centered, and wouldn't treat women the way old-styled Luzhin would. I believe Dostoevsky believes in capitalism. One quote I found from Razumihin in part 3 chapter 5 saya: "Human nature is not taken into account, it is excluded, it'...